Airtable vs Appsmith: what their users struggle with

Not a verdict and not a star rating: the problems users of Airtable and Appsmith describe in public, side by side, each one linked to its source (as of 2026-10-30).

Get started free with your email Open Airtable on Friction

Every count in this table is of open reports in the recent window (Airtable since 2022-10, Appsmith since 2023-10); older and fixed reports are not counted. The counts measure how much public discussion exists for each product, not which is better: a popular tool collects more reports.

Problems mostly raised about Airtable

• Airtable is slow for client-facing and internal work · Performance · Annoyance
• Complex Airtable schemas are difficult to map during migration · Data export & migration · Blocks work
• Record limits constrain base growth · Performance · Annoyance
• Setup requires substantial customization · UI & usability · Annoyance
• Opaque pricing and feature gating · Pricing & plans · Blocks work

Problems mostly raised about Appsmith

• Workflows are paywalled so user cannot evaluate them before paying · Pricing & plans · Annoyance
• Restore can misidentify the most recent backup · Reliability & bugs · Annoyance
• Cloud MCP sessions fail across replicas · Reliability & bugs · Blocks work
• REST queries fail when response headers exceed 8 KB · Integrations · Blocks work
• Oracle queries strip semicolons inside string literals · Integrations · Blocks work

Go further

Open Airtable and Appsmith in the compare tool to filter by area and severity, Airtable alternatives, Appsmith alternatives, or the state of low-code and internal tools.

How the data is built. A theme is a group of reports about the same problem; unique means not matched to a theme on the other product.